Hello, I
am in my writing this time I will introduce my expert, let's read through the
article below Clare MacMartin is an applied social psychologist, Associate
Professor and Associate Dean (Academic) at the College of Social and Applied
Human Sciences. He is a member of the Graduate Faculty Committee and has
overseen a graduate student in the Department of Family Relations and Applied
Nutrition, and Department of Psychology. He has used discourse analysis and
conversation analysis to study institutional communication in the field of
judicial decision-making and group and individual psychotherapy.
Clare is currently collaborating
with Jason Coe and Hannah Wheat in the Department of Population Medicine,
University of Guelph, and Cindy Adams, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Calgary, using conversation analysis to study the promise
recorded in companion animal practice. Clare interested in how conversation
analysis can inform the learning experience in clinical training programs (eg,
couples and family therapy students and veterinary students) at the University
of Guelph and elsewhere.
his graduate students have used
discourse analysis and conversation analysis to examine a variety of topics,
including the interaction of psychotherapy, conversation families with children
diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, construction media (eg, sexuality, father,
Muslim identity), Internet description autobiography teens' experiences
(anorexia nervosa and self-harm), and the doctor-patient interaction in meeting
palliative care.
Locations:
|
Office/Lab
|
Location
|
Phone
|
|
Office
|
MINS 105B
|
52419
|
Departmental Profile
Link:
http://www.uoguelph.ca/family/faculty/macmartin-clare
Post-Doc
Fellowship:
Academic
Institution:
University of Guelph
Year:
2001
Degree &
Discipline:
Psychology
PhD:
Academic
Institution:
University of Guelph
Year:
2000
Degree &
Discipline:
PhD Psychology
Master's:
Academic
Institution:
University of Toronto
Year:
1989
Degree &
Discipline:
MA Psychology
Keyword research: communication, conversation analysis,
discourse analysis, discursive psychology, legal discourse, medical
communications, qualitative research, psychotherapy, sexual harassment, sexual
violence, Statement communicationProfile animals: Clare MacMartin is a social
psychologist applied, Associate Professor and Associate Dean ( Academic) at the
College of Social and Applied Human Sciences. He is a member of the Graduate
Faculty Committee and has overseen a graduate student in the Department of
Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, and Department of Psychology. He has
used discourse analysis and conversation analysis to study the institutional
communication in the field of judicial decision-making and group and individual
psychotherapy.
Clare is currently collaborating with Jason Coe and
Hannah Wheat in the Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph,
and Cindy Adams, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, using
conversation analysis to study the promise recorded in companion animal
practice. Clare interested in how conversation analysis can inform the learning
experience in clinical training programs (eg, couples and family therapy
students and veterinary students) at the University of Guelph and elsewhere.
his graduate students have used discourse analysis and conversation analysis to
examine a variety of topics, including the interaction of psychotherapy,
conversation families with children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders,
construction media (eg, sexuality, Fatherhood, Muslim identity), Internet
descriptions autobiography of Youth ' experience (anorexia nervosa and
self-harm), and the doctor-patient interaction in meeting palliative
care.
Citation:
MacMartin, C., &
Wood, L. A. (2007). Sentencing sexual abuse offenders: Sex crimes and social
justice. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), The language of sex crimes (pp. 180-197).
Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Citation:
Wood, L. A., &
MacMartin, C. (2007). Constructing remorse: Judges' sentencing decisions in
child sexual assault cases. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26,
343-362.
Citation:
MacMartin, C. (2002).
(Un)reasonable doubt? The invocation of children's consent in sexual abuse
trial judgments. Discourse & Society, 13, 9-40.
Citation:
MacMartin, C. (2004).
Judicial constructions of the seriousness of child sexual abuse. Canadian
Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 66-80.
Citation:
MacMartin, C. (1999).
Disclosure as discourse: Theorizing children's reports of sexual abuse. Theory
& Psychology, 9, 503-532.
Invited
Presentaions:
Event Name:
Meeting of the
International Conference on Conversation Analysis
Event Country:
Germany
Event City:
Mannheim
Event Year:
2010
Title of
Presentation:
MacMartin, C., Coe, J.
B, & Adams, C. L. (July, 2010). Treating animals as if they have spoken:
"I know" responses in veterinarians' pet-directed talk.
Event Name:
Colloquium Presented
at the Center for Language, Interaction and Culture, University of California
Event Country:
United States
Event City:
Los Angeles, CA
Event Year:
2010
Title of
Presentation:
MacMartin, C., Coe, J.
B., & Adams, C. L. (October, 2010). Treating animals as if they have
spoken: Empathic "I know" responses in veteriniarians' pet-directed
talk.
Event Name:
Meeting of the
International Conference on Communication in Veterinary Medicine
Event Country:
United States
Event City:
Napa, CA
Event Year:
2010
Title of
Presentation:
MacMartin, C., Coe, J.
B, & Adams, C. L. (November, 2010). Talk to the animals: Conversation
analysis of veterinarians' "I know" responses to patients.
Event Name:
Presentation at
MediCal/Royal Canin
Event Country:
Canada
Event City:
Guelph, ON
Event Year:
2012
Title of
Presentation:
Coe, J. B., MacMartin,
C., & Wheat, H. (June, 2012). Communication research activities at the
Ontario Veterinary College.
Event Name:
Presentation at
MediCal/Royal Canin
Event Country:
Canada
Event City:
Guelph, ON
Event Year:
2012
Title of
Presentation:
Wheat, H., Coe, J. B.,
& MacMartin, C. (June, 2012). Preliminary findings of a study examining
displays of adherence during veterinarian-client diet discussions.
Dr Clare MacMartin focused her
studies on a wide range of fields, including: qualitative research methods,
especially conversation analysis and discourse analysis and its use in the
teaching of professional communication skills; communication in healthcare
settings and psychotherapy; discourse of sexual violence; and the human-animal
interaction. He is currently working with colleagues at the Ontario Veterinary
College studied the interaction veterinarian-client-patient, including
treatment recommendations nutrition and management of obesity in companion
animal practice.
Education:
PhD (Psychology) -
University of Guelph, 2000
MA (Psychology) -
University of Toronto, 1989
Nice putra, i wanna ask to you, why clare intrest with conversation analysis? And why you intrested with conversation analysis?
BalasHapusthank u indah
HapusBecause Conversation Analysis (CA), a research tradition that grew out of ethnomethodology, has some unique methodological features. It studies the social organization of 'conversation', or 'talk-in-interaction', by a detailed inspection of tape recordings and transcriptions made from such recordings. In this paper, I will describe some of those features in the interest of exploring their grounds. In doing so, I will discuss some of the problems and dilemma's conversation analysts deal with in their daily practice, using both the literature and my own experiences as resources. I will present CA's research strategy as a solution to ethnomethodology's problem of the 'invisibility' of common sense and describe it in an idealized form as a seven step procedure. I will discus some of the major criticisms leveled against it and touch on some current developments. Conversation Analysis is a disciplined way of studying the local organization of interactional episodes, its unique methodological practice has enabled its practitioners to produce a mass of insights into the detailed procedural foundations of everyday life. It has developed some very practical solutions to some rather thorny methodological problems. As such it is methodologically 'impure', but it works.
hai my twin,, I like your material about social psychologist,. I want ask to you. Is this research still can we use in this era? If we can use. Especially, for what? Thankyou
BalasHapusof course can, because Children and Internet Use: Social, Psychological and Academic Consequences for Low-income Children In psychology, social psychology is the scientific study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and .... We can ascribe the locus of a behavior to either internal or external factors. ..... may leave the relationship, especially if there are good alternatives available. ... Social psychologists frequently use survey research when they are
HapusNice saathiya bhaiya :)
BalasHapusBut can you give me some example with video to me?
Shukri bhaiya :)
this is good example for u
Hapushttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YItCE8t4WLA
Hai put, nice blog and I like your material. So I want ask to you. Clare applied social psychologist right? So why clare interested about it? And what is the best books from clare?
BalasHapusThankyou put
Clare is interested in how conversation analysis can inform experiential learning in clinical training programs (e.g., of couple and family therapy students and veterinary students) at the University of Guelph and elsewhere.
Hapusand the best book from Clare isDoing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text this link for you if you want read (https://books.google.co.id/books?isbn=0803973519)
Hy putra. I like your post. It's interested. Hm i wanna ask question to you. Could you tell to me theory of clare macmartin about conversation analysis? Thank youu
BalasHapusi'am sorry, i can't found theory of clare macmartin about conversation analysis
HapusNice Ali bin abi thalib R.A , do you know her ideology?
BalasHapusi don't know what her ideology, thank u my lords
HapusHi putra,, i like your material. I have question for you, what is the famous research of clare?. And is conversation analysis have relation with DA?.
BalasHapusThank you
Memory Matters: Contexts for Understanding Sexual Abuse Recollections
Hapushttps://books.google.co.id/books?isbn=1135256012
Janice Haaken, Paula Reavey - 2009 - Psychology
For a related but slightly different take on 'agency' see Reavey and Brown (2006). 11 Clare MacMartin's research (MacMartin, 2001)
Both discourse analysis and conversation analysis are qualitative in nature and analyse the functional and sense-making properties of language. However, these similarities stop at this broad level, and when examined in depth the intricate differences emerge.
Both conversation and discourse analysis reflect the concerns of ethnomethodology. Ethnomethodology, pioneered by Garfinkel (1967), is primarily concerned with how social action is accomplished through the competencies of participants. Much of social life is mediated through spoken and written communication, and, therefore, language is central to ethnomethodology in sociology. However, the conversation work of Sacks focuses on the communicative competencies that inform ordinary conversation and looks more objectively at the structures of interaction, whereas ethnomethodology is somewhat interpretative.
Our answer to this question is based on the materials found in the book by Robin Wooffitt. You may find this a useful reference:
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
hi putra, I'm interest with your material about conversation analysis. but I want ask question, what is the usefulness this research for human life? thankyou
BalasHapusDescribe some of the findings of conversation analysis in the context of primary care; ... studies of everyday casual conversation, but CA is also used to study ... feature of human socio-cultural life, and a second major source of ... CA investigates interaction by examining the practices that participants use to construct it.
HapusConversation is an enterprise in which one person speaks, and another listens. Discourse analysts who study conversation note that speakers have systems for determining when one person's turn is over and the next person's turn begins. This exchange of turns or 'floors' is signaled by such linguistic means as intonation, pausing, and phrasing. Some people await a clear pause before beginning to speak, but others assume that 'winding down' is an invitation to someone else to take the floor. When speakers have different assumptions about how turn exchanges are signaled, they may inadvertently interrupt or feel interrupted. On the other hand, speakers also frequently take the floor even though they know the other speaker has not invited them to do so.
Listenership too may be signaled in different ways. Some people expect frequent nodding as well as listener feedback such as 'mhm', 'uhuh', and 'yeah'. Less of this than you expect can create the impression that someone is not listening; more than you expect can give the impression that you are being rushed along. For some, eye contact is expected nearly continually; for others, it should only be intermittent. The type of listener response you get can change how you speak: If someone seems uninterested or uncomprehending (whether or not they truly are), you may slow down, repeat, or overexplain, giving the impression you are 'talking down.' Frederick Erickson has shown that this can occur in conversations between black and white speakers, because of different habits with regard to showing listenership.
Hi putra, nice article
BalasHapuswhat conversation analysis still exist till today? and actually how this research work in our daily life? thankyou
The term "conversation analysis" (CA) is by now quite firmly established as the name for a particular paradigm in the study of verbal interaction that was initiated in the 1960s by Harvey SACKS, in collaboration with Emanuel SCHEGLOFF and Gail JEFFERSON. In CA the focus is on the procedural analysis of talk-in-interaction, how participants systematically organize their interactions to solve a range of organizational problems, such as the distribution of turns at talking, the collaborative production of particular actions, or problems of understanding. The analysis is always based on audio or visual recordings of interaction, which are carefully transcribed in detail. The research should be "data-driven"—in the sense that concepts and hypotheses should be based on careful consideration of the data, recordings and transcript, rather than drawn from theoretical preconceptions or ideological preferences. While originally conceived from a sociological perspective, CA gained a wide-spread reception in many parts of the world by researchers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds, including: psychology, anthropology, communication studies and a variety of linguistic sub-disciplines. As part of this development, there now are quite a number of introductory texts, both as book chapters and books (such as PSATHAS, 1995; HUTCHBY & WOOFFITT, 1998; TEN HAVE, 1999; MAZELAND, 2003). In the current volume, Robin WOOFFITT has written one which is quite distinctive in its confrontational character. [2]
HapusThe term "discourse analysis" is much less clear than "conversation analysis," or rather, it is used in many different ways by different people, in different countries and in different contexts. On the one hand, it can serve as an overall blanket term for any and all efforts to analyze "discourse," texts, talk and so forth. But many people in the U.K., including the author of the book under review, use it to indicate one particular, although diversified, research tradition which, nowadays, finds its most prominent expression in a branch of social psychology which is called "discursive psychology" and is associated with people like Derek EDWARDS and Jonathan POTTER at Loughborough University in the UK. By in large, it is this kind of "discourse analysis" (DA) that WOOFFITT uses as a "sparring partner" for his discussion of CA. In later chapters, he also discusses "critical discourse analysis" (CDA), associated with people like Norman FAIRCLOUGH, Teun VAN DIJK and Ruth WODAK and what he calls "Foucauldian discourse analysis" (FDA), which represents a British approach more or less inspired by the writings of Michel FOUCAULT and Jacques DERRIDA.